Backtesting Algos Tables

Logo	Name	Date	Instrument	TimeFrame	# Trades	% Profitable	Profit	Settings	Links	Comments
	EMA Algo Trader	6/12-6/23 10-3:30	NQ - 1contract	BR30	25	48	+6200	EMAs 8/34, No filter, Only 34B, Parabolic Stop 60,	Link1 Link2 Link3 Set	SL is not above previous bar high/low
	EMA Algo Trader	6/12-6/23 10-3:30	MNQ -5 contrats	BR30	50	36%	+2142	EMAs 8/34, No filter, Only 34B, Parabolic Stop 60,	link1 Link3
	EMA Algo Trader	6/12-6/23 10-3:30	MNQ -5 contrats	BR30	66	70%	+223	EMAs 8/34, No filter, Only 34B. Dynamic SLTP ATR 1	Link1 Link3	Test was done dynamically and not on bar based
	EMA Algo Trader	4/17-6/12 10-3:30	NQ -1 contract	BR30	160	33	+3750	EMAs 8/34, No filter, Only 34B. Parabolic Stop 50	link Link2 Link3 Link4	Note 2 months. Max drawdown is -1080
	EMA Algo Trader	4/142-6/12 10-3:30	NQ -1 contract	BR30	51	57%	+4590	EMA 21/50, dynamic SL, trail 60.	Link1 Link2 Link3
	EMA Algo Trader	4/142-6/12 10-3:30	NQ -1 contract	1000t	84	38%	-3255	EMA 21/50, dynamic SLTP ATR1	Link1 Link2 Link3	MOstly designed to run as 1:1 RR
	EMA Algo Trader	4/142-6/12 10-3:30	NQ -1 contract		144	47	-1880	EMA 8/34, dynamic SLTP ATR1	Link1	Usual settings
MNQ generates twice as much signals on the same parameters. The larger TF the less filter is becoming needed.BetterRenko bars perform better then Ninzarenko. When using dynamic one is betting on "this"accurate trade, when using parabolic one is betting on "overall" trade performace. Test5 suggests that there can be 2-3 days in drawdown before it will make a big leap and recover losses.

10%